Understanding smartwatches

Understanding smartwatches

By Matt Burns

I was wrong. Several years ago I reviewed the first Garmin Fenix 3 smartwatch. This was before the release of the Apple Watch. That’s key to this story. I declared Garmin would have a hard time selling the Fenix 3. The Apple Watch would be better in every way, I pointed out. Therefore, there would be little reason to buy the Fenix 3.

But here I am, in the middle of the woods, wearing the fifth generation of the Garmin Fenix while my Apple Watch sits at home on my desk.

In some ways I was right. The Apple Watch is better by most measurable attributes: there are more apps, the screen is superior, there’s a vibrant accessory market, and it’s thinner, faster and cheaper.

The Garmin Fenix is big, clunky and the screen looks like it’s from a Kindle. It’s not a touchscreen nor does it have the number of apps or band options of the Apple Watch. I like it. To me, the Garmin Fenix is akin to a modern Casio G-Shock, and that’s what I want to wear right now.

Smartwatches are often reviewed like phones or vacuums. Specs are compared, and conclusions are drawn. Wearability is talked about, and …read more

Source:: TechCrunch Gadgets

Lenovo Flex 11 (2018) review: A two-in-one that's inexpensive without feeling cheap     - CNET Previous post Lenovo Flex 11 (2018) review: A two-in-one that's inexpensive without feeling cheap - CNET 2019 Mazda MX-5 Miata review: The Roadster, refined     - Roadshow Next post 2019 Mazda MX-5 Miata review: The Roadster, refined - Roadshow